|
|
Page No. |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
|
|
Introduction |
4 |
|
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress |
4 |
|
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels |
4 |
|
Air Quality |
4 |
|
Construction Noise |
4-5 |
|
Ecological Monitoring |
5 |
|
Environmental Non-Compliance |
5 |
|
Environmental Complaint |
5 |
|
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions |
5 |
|
Reporting Changes |
5 |
|
Future Key Issues |
5 |
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
Purpose of the report |
6 |
|
Structure of the report |
6-7 |
2 |
PROJECT INFORMATION |
|
|
Background |
8 |
|
Project Organization |
8 |
|
Summary of Construction Works Undertaken During
Reporting Month |
8 |
|
Construction Programme |
8 |
|
Status of Environmental Licences,
Notifications and Permits |
8-9 |
|
Summary of EM&A Requirement |
9 |
|
Status of Compliance with Environmental Permits
Conditions |
9-10 |
3 |
AIR QUALITY MONITORING |
|
|
Monitoring Requirements |
11 |
|
Monitoring Location |
11 |
|
Monitoring Equipment |
11-12 |
|
Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration |
12 |
|
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC Procedure |
12-13 |
|
Results and Observations |
13-14 |
|
Event and Action Plan |
14 |
4 |
NOISE MONITORING |
|
|
Monitoring Requirements |
15 |
|
Monitoring Location |
15 |
|
Monitoring Equipment |
15-16- |
|
Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration |
16 |
|
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC Procedures |
16-17 |
|
Maintenance and Calibration |
17 |
|
Results and Observations |
17-18 |
5 |
ECOLOGICAL MONITORING |
|
|
Monitoring of Flora Species of Conservation Interest |
19 |
|
Post-Transplantation Monitoring and Maintenance
Programme |
19-20 |
|
Results and Observations |
20-23 |
|
Precautionary Measure for Butterfly Species of
Conservation Interest |
23 |
|
Precautionary Measures to Minimize Indirect
Disturbance on Ecology |
23 |
6 |
LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL MONITORING |
|
|
Monitoring Requirements |
24 |
7 |
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INSPECTION |
|
|
Site Audits |
25-26 |
|
Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation
Measures |
26 |
|
Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status |
26-27 |
8 |
ENVIRONMENTAL
NON-CONFORMANCE |
|
|
Summary of Exceedances |
28 |
|
Summary of Environmental Non-Compliance |
28 |
|
Summary of Environmental Complaint |
28 |
|
Summary of Environmental Summon and Successful
Prosecution |
28 |
9 |
FUTURE KEY ISSUES |
|
|
Key Issues in the Coming Three Months |
29-30 |
|
Monitoring Schedule for the Next Month |
30 |
10 |
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
|
Conclusions |
31 |
|
Recommendations |
31-32 |
LIST OF TABLES
Table I Summary Table for
EM&A Activities in the Reporting Month
Table II Summary
Table for Events Recorded in the Reporting Month
Table 2.1 Key
Contacts of the Project
Table 2.2 Status
of Environmental Licences, Notifications and Permits (Contract No. SSK509)
Table 2.3 Summary
Table for Status of Compliance / Required Submission
Table 3.1 Location
for Air Quality Monitoring Locations
Table 3.2 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3.3 Impact
Dust Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Table 3.4 Summary
Table of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results during the Reporting Month
Table 3.5 Observation
at Dust Monitoring Stations
Table 4.1 Location
for Noise Monitoring Stations
Table 4.2 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Table 4.3 Noise
Monitoring Parameters, Duration and Frequency
Table 4.4 Summary
Table of Noise Monitoring Results during the Reporting Month
Table 4.5 Observation
at Noise Monitoring Stations
Table 5.1 Implementation
Status of Protection Measures for Flora Species of Conservation Interest
Table 7.1 Observations
and Recommendations of Site Audit
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Layout Plan
Figure 2 Location of Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Figure 3 Location of Noise Monitoring Stations
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Construction
Programme and Proactive Environmental Protection Proforma
Appendix B Action
and Limit Levels
Appendix C Copies
of Calibration Certificates
Appendix D Environmental
Monitoring Schedules
Appendix E Air
Quality Monitoring Results and Graphical Presentation
Appendix F Noise
Monitoring Results and Graphical Presentation
Appendix G Weather
Condition
Appendix H Ecological
Monitoring Records
Appendix I Event
Action Plans
Appendix J Summary
of Exceedance
Appendix K Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS)
Appendix L Waste
Generation in the Reporting Month
Appendix M Complaint
Log
Appendix N Summary
of Successful Prosecution
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
1.
This is
the 3rd monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report for the
Project of Police Facilities in Kong Nga Po under Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/510/2016.
This report was prepared by Ka Shing Management Consultancy Ltd. (Ka Shing)
under “Service Contract Quotation No. PMB202/8480/2022/A01/A Provision of
Environmental Team consultancy for Design and Construction of Kong Nga Po
Police Training Facilities” (hereinafter called the “Service Contract”). This
report documents the findings of Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A)
work conducted from 1st to 30th June 2023.
2.
Part
of the construction site was handed over to Architectural Services Department
(ArchSD) on 23rd December 2022 whom taken over responsibility for the
construction of building works and as maintenance agent for Hong Kong Police
Force (HKPF) during operation phase.
3.
During
the reporting month, the following Works Contracts were undertaken for the
Project of Police Facilities in Kong Nga Po under Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/510/2016:
Contract No. SSK509 - Design and Construction of Kong Nga Po Police Training
Facilities
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Progress
4.
A
summary of the EM&A activities in this reporting month is listed in Table
I below:
Table I Summary Table for EM&A Activities
in the Reporting Month
EM&A
Activities |
Date |
Air Quality Monitoring |
2, 8, 14, 20, 26, 30 June 2023 |
Noise Monitoring |
8, 14, 20, 26 June 2023 |
Ecological Monitoring |
30 June 2023 |
Environmental Site
Inspection |
6, 14, 20, 27 June 2023 |
landscape & Visual
Inspection and the Ecological Monitoring |
6, 13, 27 June 2023 |
Breaches of
Action and Limit Levels
5. Summary of the environmental exceedances of
the reporting month is tabulated in Table II.
Air Quality
6. All construction air quality monitoring was
conducted as scheduled in the reporting month. No Action/Limit Level exceedance was recorded.
Construction
Noise
7. All construction noise monitoring was
conducted as scheduled in the reporting month. No Action/Limit Level exceedance was recorded.
Table II Summary Table for Events Recorded in the
Reporting Month
Environmental Monitoring |
Parameter |
No. of Non-Project related Exceedances |
No. of Exceedance related to the Construction
Works of the Contract |
Action Taken |
||
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Air Quality |
1-hr TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Noise |
Leq(30min) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Ecological Monitoring
8. All ecological monitoring was conducted as
scheduled in the reporting month. The ecological monitoring result in the reporting month is shown in Appendix
H.
Environmental Non-Compliance
9. No environmental non-compliance was
recorded in the reporting month
Environmental Complaint
10. No environmental complaint was received in
the reporting month.
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
11. No notification of summons or successful
prosecutions was received in the reporting month.
Reporting Changes
12. Part of the construction site was handed over
to Architectural Services Department (ArchSD) on 23rd December 2022 whom took over responsibility for the
construction of building works. So, the
site activities and implementation status of environmental mitigation measures
related to ArchSD Contract are
presented in this Monthly EM&A Report.
Future Key Issues
13. The major site activities for the coming
three months include:
- Setting-up of site office
- Open cut excavation
- Removal of soil
- Construction of footings
- Pre-bored socketed-H Piling
- U.U. Lead in and Pipe Duct Connection
14. Potential environmental impacts arising from
the above construction activities are mainly associated
with construction dust, noise, water quality and waste management. For the
details, please refer to Appendix A
regarding the anticipated major impacts from the construction works and corresponding recommended mitigation
measures.
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Ka
Shing Management Consultancy Ltd. (Ka Shing) was commissioned by the
Architectural Services Department (ASD) as the Environmental Team to undertake
the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) works for the Project of
Police Facilities in Kong Nga Po under Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/510/2016
to ensure that the environmental performance of the Works Contracts comply with
the requirements specified in the Environmental Permits (EPs), Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) Report and Environmental Monitoring & Audit
(EM&A) Manual of the Police Facilities in Kong Nga Po Project and other
relevant statutory requirements.
1.2
The
major construction works for the Project commenced on 3rd July 2020 and the
main site in Kong Nga Po was handed over to Architectural Services Department
(ASD) on 23rd December 2022 whom taken over responsibility for the construction
of building works and as maintenance agent for Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF)
during operation phase.
Purpose of the report
Structure of the report
1.4 The structure of the report is as follows:
Section 1: Introduction - purpose and structure of the
report.
Section
2: Project Information – summarises
background and scope of the Project, site description, project organisation and
contact details, construction programme, the construction works undertaken and
the status of Environmental Permits/Licences during the reporting month.
Section 3: Air Quality Monitoring – summarises the
monitoring parameters, monitoring
programmes,
monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequencies, monitoring locations, Action
and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event /Action Plans.
Section
4: Noise Monitoring – summarises the
monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies,
monitoring frequencies, monitoring locations, Action and Limit Levels,
monitoring results and Event/Action Plans.
Section 5: Ecological
Monitoring – summarises the monitoring results of the monthly ecological
monitoring undertaken within the reporting month.
Section 6: Landscape
and Visual Monitoring – summarises the audit results of the site inspection
undertaken within the reporting month.
Section 7: Environmental
Site Inspection – summarises the audit findings of the weekly site inspections
undertaken within the reporting month.
Section 8: Environmental
Non-conformance – summarises any monitoring exceedance, environmental
complaints, environmental summons and successful prosecutions within the
reporting month.
Section 9: Future
Key Issues – summarises the impact forecast for the next three months and
monitoring schedule in the next month.
Section 10: Conclusions and Recommendations
2 PROJECT INFORMATION
Background
2.1 The
Project mainly includes construction and operation of various police facilities. The
police facilities include:
(i) a helipad;
(ii) two firing ranges;
and
(iii) other facilities,
associated infrastructure & utilities, etc.
2.2 The
Project is a Designated Project under the Environmental Impact Assessment
Ordinance (EIAO). An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Report No.:
AEIAR-201/2016) for the Project was approved under EIAO in October 2016 in
accordance with the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-276/2014) and the Technical
Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM). The
corresponding Environmental Permit was issued (EP no.: FEP-01/510/2016) by the
Director of Environmental Protection (DEP).
2.3
According to an approved Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A)
Manual, an air quality and noise monitoring programme is recommended during the
construction phases of the Project to monitor the expected dust and noise
nuisances. Baseline air quality and noise monitoring were conducted by previous
ET (Wellab Limited) from 14th March 2020 to 2nd April 2020 to establish the
background conditions of the designated sensitive receivers prior to the
commencement of the Project’s construction works.
2.4 The site layout plan for the Project is shown
in Figure 1.
Project
Organization
2.5 Different
parties with different levels of involvement in the Project organization under
EP no.: FEP-01/510/2016 include:
Project Proponent – Architectural Services Department
(ArchSD)
Contractor– China State JV
Environmental Team (ET) – Ka Shing Management
Consultancy Ltd.
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) – Acuity
Sustainability Consulting Limited
2.6 The
key personnel contact names and numbers under Quotation No.
PMB202/8480/2022/A01/A and the other contact names and numbers under ArchSD
Contract No. SSK509 are summarised in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Key Contacts of the Project
Party |
Role |
Contact
Person |
Phone No. |
Fax No. |
Architectural Services Department |
Project Proponent |
Mr. Vincent Kwok |
2867 3939 |
3542 5223 |
Contractor (China State JV) |
Site Agent |
Mr.
Kelvin Chan |
6272 8828 |
2866 6325 |
Senior Environmental Officer |
Ms.
Marian Kong |
6174 9735 |
2866 6325 |
|
Ka Shing Management Consultancy Ltd. |
ETL |
Mr. W.H. Lee |
2618 2166 |
2120 7752 |
Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited |
IEC |
Ir. Y.H. Law |
2698 6833 |
2698 9383 |
Summary of
Construction Works Undertaken During Reporting Month
2.7 The major site activities undertaken in the
reporting month included:
- Preparation for
excavation
- Ground
Investigation
- Pre-bored
socketed-H Piling
Construction
Programme
2.8 A copy of Contractors’ construction
programmes is provided in Appendix A.
2.9 A
summary of the relevant permits, licences, and/or notifications on
environmental protection for this Project is presented in Table 2.2
Table 2.2 Status of Environmental Licences,
Notifications and Permits
Permit / Licence
No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
|
From |
To |
||
Further
Environmental Permit (FEP) |
|||
FEP-01/510/2016 |
N/A |
N/A |
Valid |
Construction Noise
Permit (CNP) |
|||
GW-RN0478-23 |
10-05-2023 |
09-08-2023 |
Valid |
Notification
pursuant to Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
|||
EPD Ref no.: 487864 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Billing Account
for Construction Waste Disposal |
|||
Account No. 7046289 |
18-01-2023 |
N/A |
Valid |
Registration of
Chemical Waste Producer |
|||
WPN5213-641-C4770-01 |
18-01-2023 |
N/A |
Valid |
Effluent Discharge
Licence under Water Pollution Control Ordinance |
|||
WT00043663-2023 |
21-04-2023 |
30-04-2028 |
Valid |
Summary of
EM&A Requirement
2.10 The
EM&A programme requires construction noise monitoring, air quality
monitoring, ecological monitoring and environmental site audits. The EM&A requirements
are described in the following sections, including:
l
All
monitoring parameters;
l
Action
and Limit levels for all environmental parameters;
l
Event
/ Action Plans;
l
Environmental
mitigation measures, as recommended in the Project EIA study final report; and
l
Environmental
requirements in contract documents.
Status of
Compliance with Environmental Permits Conditions
2.11 The
status of compliance with Environmental Permit (EP) No. FEP-01/510/2016 and
required submission related to this Project under the EP is summarized in Table
2.3:
Table 2.3 Summary Table for Status of Compliance /
Required Submission under FEP No. FEP-01/510/2016
EP Conditions |
Submission |
Submission Date |
Approval Status |
1.12 |
Notification
of Commencement Date of Construction |
30/3/2023 |
* |
2.7 |
Proposal
on the Reporting Mechanism and Curriculum Vitae of the IEC |
20/3/2023 |
* |
2.10 |
The
date of setting up the Community Liaison Hotline and the contact details |
27/2/2023 |
* |
2.11 |
Management
Organizations |
10/3/2023 |
* |
2.12 |
Construction
Works Schedule and Location Plans |
10/3/2023 |
* |
2.13 |
Layout
plan for permeable pavings |
29/3/2023 |
For approval |
2.14 |
Landscape
and visual mitigation
plan |
26/6/2023 |
For approval |
2.16 |
Plan
for perimeter walls/ boundary wall sat project site and sidewalls of firing
range |
1 month before fence wall works |
For approval |
2.19 |
Submission
of Helicopter Flight Plan |
1 month before commencement of operation of Helipad |
Notification |
3.3 |
Baseline
Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Report |
30/3/2023 |
Deposit |
4.2 |
Internet
address of a dedicated web site |
13/4/2023 |
Notification |
Remarks: *
Approval not required in FEP-01/510/2016
3 AIR QUALITY MONITORING
Monitoring
Requirements
3.1
In accordance with the EM&A Manual, impact 1-hour TSP monitoring was
conducted to monitor the air quality for the Works Contracts. Appendix B
shows the established Action/Limit Levels for the air quality monitoring works.
3.2 Impact
1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted for at least three times every 6 day at one
air quality monitoring station.
Monitoring
Location
3.3 According
to Section 2.2.5 of the EM&A Manual, impact air quality monitoring was
conducted at the two designated monitoring stations for the Project as shown in
Figure 2. Table 3.1 describes the location of the air quality monitoring
stations.
Table 3.1 Location for Air Quality Monitoring
Stations
Monitoring Station |
Location of Measurement |
AM1 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
AM2 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
Monitoring
Equipment
3.4 As
the setup of HVS for 1-hour TSP monitoring at the designated locations and
request for secured supply of electricity for HVS were not allowed by the
villager, direct reading dust meters was therefore used to carry out the 1-hour
TSP monitoring. Dust meter has been commonly used for measuring 1-hour TSP
levels in a number of designated projects of major infrastructure works. The
proposed use of direct reading dust meter was submitted to IEC and agreed by
the IEC. With the use of direct reading dust meter, it can allow prompt and
direct results for the EM&A reporting and the implementation of the event
and action plan. The 1-hour sampling was determined on bi-monthly basis by the
HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct
reading method.
3.5 Table
3.2 summarises the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring
programme. Copies of calibration certificates are attached in Appendix C.
Table 3.2 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model and Make |
Quantity |
Dust Monitor |
SIBATA (LD-3B) |
2 |
3.6 Meteorological
information was extracted from “Hong Kong Observatory - General Weather
Conditions during the Monitoring Period (June 2023)” in Appendix G as
the alternative method to obtain representative wind data.
3.7 The weather conditions (i.e. sunny, cloudy or
rainy) were recorded by the field staff as well during the monitoring days.
Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
3.8 Table
3.3 summarises the monitoring parameters and frequencies of impact dust
monitoring during the Works Contracts activities. The air quality monitoring
schedule for the reporting month is shown in Appendix D.
Table 3.3 Impact Dust Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Parameters |
Frequency |
1-hr TSP |
Three times/ 6 days |
Monitoring
Methodology and QA/QC Procedure
1-hour TSP Air
Quality Monitoring
Instrumentation
3.9 Direct reading dust meter was deployed for
the air quality monitoring as shown in
Table 3.2.
3.10 The measuring procedures of the dust meter are
in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
l When
the Model LD-3B is turned on, the set time displayed at the bottom left of the
liquid crystal display is [01 min].
l When the start/stop switch is pressed once
at this time, a measurement of 1minute is taken. The length of the measurement
will depend on the time that is set and displayed.
l A down timer is displayed at the bottom
right of the liquid crystal display
Maintenance/Calibration
3.11 The following maintenance/calibration was
required for the direct dust meters:
l
Check
and calibrate the dust meter by High Volume Sampler (HVS) to check the validity
and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method. Calibration of
dust meter should be carried out on a bi-monthly basis throughout all stages of
the air quality monitoring.
l
The
correlation of dust meter and HVS in TSP measurement was obtained by direct
comparison of the weight of dust particle trapped in a filter paper using HVS
with the reading of the dust meter. Calibration of the dust meter with HVS
should be powered on and off at the same location and the same time.
l
The
correlation coefficient was checked to establish the correlation relationship
between the dust meter and HVS. The correlation factor was determined by
comparing the results of HVS and dust meter.
l
Checking
is made prior to dust monitoring commencing to ensure all equipment is in good
working condition with necessary power supply. Zero count test were conducted
before and after each monitoring event.
Results and
Observations
3.12 The monitoring results for 1-hour TSP
monitoring are summarised in Table 3.4. Detailed monitoring results and
graphical presentations of 1-hour TSP monitoring results are shown in Appendix
E.
Table 3.4 Summary Table of 1-hour TSP Monitoring
Results during the Reporting Month
Monitoring Station |
Concentration |
Action Level, µg/m3 |
Limit Level, µg/m3 |
|
(µg/m3) |
||||
Average |
Range |
|||
AM1 |
51 |
42 – 63 |
308 |
500 |
AM2 |
57 |
43 – 74 |
311 |
3.13 1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted as
scheduled in the reporting month. No Action/Limit Level exceedances were
recorded.
3.14 According to our field observations, the
major dust source identified at the designated air quality monitoring stations
in the reporting month are shown in Table 3.5:
Table 3.5 Observation at Dust Monitoring Stations
Monitoring Station |
Major Dust Source |
AM1 |
Road traffic, exposed site area, site
vehicle / equipment operation and movement |
AM2 |
Road traffic, exposed site area, site
vehicle / equipment operation and movement, vehicle / equipment operation and
movement at warehouse nearby |
Event and Action
Plan
3.15 Should
project-related non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with
the Event Action Plan in Appendix I shall be carried out.
4 NOISE
MONITORING
Monitoring Requirements
4.1 In
accordance with EM&A Manual, construction noise monitoring was conducted in
terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq) to
monitor the construction noise arising from the construction activities. The
regular monitoring frequency for each monitoring station shall be on a weekly
basis and one set of measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal
weekdays shall be conducted. Appendix B
shows the established Action/Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring
works.
Monitoring Location
4.2 According
to Section 3.2.3 of the EM&A Manual, impact noise monitoring was conducted
at fourteen designated noise monitoring stations. With reference to the
principle of EIA report of the Project, noise monitoring station within 300 m
from the boundary of this Project are considered. In such regard, six noise
monitoring stations as shown in Figure 3
as relevant monitoring locations. Table 4.1 describes the locations of the
noise monitoring stations.
Table 4.1 Location of Noise Monitoring Stations
Monitoring Station |
Location of Measurement |
NM9 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
NM10 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
NM11 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
NM12 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
NM13 |
Village House, Kong Nga Po |
NM14 |
Village House, near Man Kam To Road |
Monitoring
Equipment
4.3 Integrating Sound Level Meters were used for
impact noise monitoring. The meters were Type 1 sound level meter capable of
giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent
continuous sound pressure level (Leq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx)
that also complied with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications
651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications. Table 4.2
summarises the noise monitoring equipment being used. Copies of calibration
certificates are attached in Appendix C.
Table 4.2 Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Quantity |
Sound Level Meter |
RION NL-52 |
1 |
Sound Calibrator |
RION NC-73 |
1 |
Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
4.4 Table 4.3 summarises the
monitoring parameters, frequency and total duration of monitoring. The noise monitoring schedule is shown in Appendix
D.
Table 4.3 Noise Monitoring Parameters, Duration and
Frequency
Monitoring Stations |
Parameter |
Duration |
Frequency |
Measurement |
NM9 |
L10(30 min.) dB(A)[2] |
0700-1900 hrs on normal weekdays |
Once per week |
Free field[1] |
NM10 |
Free field[1] |
|||
NM11 |
Façade |
|||
NM12 |
Façade |
|||
NM13 |
Free field[1] |
|||
NM14 |
Free field[1] |
Remarks:
[1]: Correction of +3dB (A) for Free-field
Measurement.
[2]: A-weighted equivalent continuous sound
pressure level (Leq). It is the constant noise level which, under a given
situation and time period, contains the same acoustic energy as the actual
time-varying noise level.
L10 is the level exceeded for 10% of the
time. For 10% of the time, the sound or noise has a sound pressure level above
L10.
L90 is the level exceeded for 90% of the
time. For 90% of the time, the noise level is above this level.
Monitoring
Methodology and QA/QC Procedures
4.5 The monitoring procedures are as follows:
l
The
sound level meter was set on a tripod at a point 1m from the exterior of the
noise sensitive facade and at the position of 1.2m above the ground;
l
For
free field measurement, the meter was positioned away from any nearby
reflective surfaces. Free field noise levels were adjusted with a correction of
+3 dB(A);
l
The
battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter;
l
Parameters
such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were
set as follows:
—
frequency weighting :
A
—
time weighting
: Fast
—
time measurement
: Leq(30 min.) dB(A)
(as six consecutive
Leq, 5min readings) during non-restricted hours (i.e. 0700-1900 hrs on normal
weekdays)
l
Prior
to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a
Calibrator for 94.0 dB at 1000 Hz. If the difference in the calibration level
before and after measurement was more than 1.0 dB, the measurement would be
considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would be required after re-
calibration or repair of the equipment;
l
During
the monitoring period, the Leq, L90 and L10 were recorded. In addition, site
conditions and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet;
l
Noise
measurement was paused temporarily during periods of high intrusive noise (e.g.
dog barking, helicopter noise) if possible and observation record during
measurement period should be provided; and
l
Noise
monitoring was cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady
speed exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. The wind speed
should be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the
wind speed in m/s.
Maintenance and
Calibration
4.6 The microphone head of the sound level meter
and calibrator were cleaned with a soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
4.7 The sound level meter and calibrator were
checked and calibrated at yearly intervals.
4.8 Immediately prior to and following each noise
measurement, the accuracy of the sound level meter should be checked using an
acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. Measurements would be accepted as valid only if the calibration
levels before and after the noise measurement agreed to within 1.0 dB.
Results and
Observations
4.9 The noise monitoring results are summarised
in Table 4.4. Detailed monitoring results and graphical presentations of noise
monitoring are shown in Appendix F.
The weather information for the reporting month is summarised in Appendix G.
Table 4.4 Summary Table of Noise Monitoring
Results during the Reporting Month
Monitoring Station |
Average |
Range |
Baseline Level |
Limit Level |
Leq (30 min) dB(A) |
Leq (30 min) dB(A) |
dB(A) |
dB(A) |
|
NM9[1] |
61.1 |
58.9–63.4 |
55.9 |
75 |
NM10[1] |
52.0 |
50.4–54.4 |
52.8 |
|
NM11 |
51.1 |
48.8–55.1 |
46.4 |
|
NM12 |
51.2 |
49.6–53.4 |
54.7 |
|
NM13[1] |
53.8 |
51.7–55.9 |
61.3 |
|
NM14[1] |
50.1 |
48.5–52.0 |
59.6 |
Remarks:
[1]: Correction of +3dB (A) for Free-field
Measurement.
4.10 Construction noise monitoring was conducted
as scheduled in the reporting month. No Action/Limit Level exceedance was
recorded. The summary of exceedance record in reporting month is shown in Appendix
J.
4.11 According to our field observations, the
major noise sources identified at the designated noise monitoring stations in
the reporting month are as follows:
Table 4.5 Observation at Noise Monitoring Stations
Monitoring Station |
Major Noise Source |
NM9 |
Road traffic, excavation works, loading & unloading |
NM10 |
Road traffic, excavation works, loading &
unloading |
NM11 |
Road traffic |
NM12 |
Road traffic, loading & unloading |
NM13 |
Road traffic, loading & unloading |
NM14 |
Road traffic, dog barking |
Event and Action
Plan
4.12 Should any project related to
non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event
Action Plan in Appendix I shall be carried out.
5 ECOLOGICAL MONITORING
Monitoring of
Flora Species of Conservation Interest
5.1 As required under Section 8.3.2 of
EM&A Manual, during construction phase, temporary protective fence shall be
erected enclosing the flora species of conservation interest identified under
the detailed vegetation survey. The temporary protective fence shall be
properly maintained and monitored for the effectiveness. Monthly monitoring of
individual of flora species of conservation interest identified in the detailed
vegetation survey shall be conducted during the construction phase to make sure
that the flora species of conservation interest are not affected by the
construction activities of the Project.
5.2 The
purpose of the monitoring is to monitor the timely implementation of proper
environmental management practices and mitigation measures for the retained and
transplanted individuals of flora species of conservation interest. Proper
erection and maintenance of the temporary protective fence enclosing the
individuals was inspected for the effectiveness. The recommended protection
measures in the implementation schedule as stated in approved transplantation
proposal were monitored and the conditions of the individuals of flora species
of conservation interest were recorded as shown in Table 5.1.
5.3 According to the approved detailed
vegetation survey report and transplantation proposal, 71 individuals of
Brainea insignis, 41 individuals of Spiranthes sinensis and 3 individuals of
Aquilaria sinensis were identified to be transplanted to the receptor site. 51
individuals of Keteleeria fortunei, 26 undersized seedlings of Keteleeria
fortunei and 7 undersized seedlings of Aquilaria sinensis were identified to be
retained along Kong Nga Po Road near Police Dog Unit and Force Search Unit
Training School.
Post-Transplantation
Monitoring and Maintenance Programme
5.4 According to approved transplantation
proposal, post-transplantation monitoring should be conducted by the Contractor
once per week in the first three months and once per month afterwards during
the 12-month establishment period and the post-establishment period until the
end of construction phase of the Project. Regular monitoring allows early
detection of the growth status of transplanted species, sign of construction
activity within and nearby the receptor site, and any environmental change of the
receptor site.
5.5 Maintenance
works were recommended for the first year of establishment to allow health
growth of the transplanted species. In view of the condition of transplanted
individuals after the 12-month establishment period, maintenance works were
recommended to extend during the Post-establishment Period until the end of
Construction Phase. Watering was recommended in daily practice during the first
three months after the transplantation and during the dry season. Watering
frequency may be reduced to at least twice a week and adjusted based on the
plant condition to keep the soil moist. Other maintenance works like the use of
mulch and weeding shall be conducted if required.
Results and
Observations
5.6 Monthly
monitoring of flora species of conservation interest was conducted by the
Contractor on 30th June 2023 during the reporting month. The implementation
status of protection measures as stated in the approved transplantation
proposal and the maintenance of temporary protective fence were inspected. The
implementation status of protection measures is shown in Table 5.1 and
photographic record and checklists for monthly monitoring are shown in Appendix
H. The health conditions of the transplanted / retained species are
generally in fair and poor condition. The Contractor was reminded to closely monitor
the transplanted species and implement the protection measures according to the
approved transplantation proposal to protect the transplanted / retained
species. In addition, the Contractor was also advised of the following:
1)
To
arrange the new tags for those Brainea insignis with missing tags;
2)
To
replace the faded plant labels identified in the receptor site.
3)
To
refer to the guidelines on soil improvement issued by the Greening, Landscape
and Tree Management Section (GLTMS) of the development bureau (2022) to apply
to monitoring and maintenance of transplanted flora species.
4)
To install
shaded nets
Transplanted Brainea
insignis and Spiranthes sinensis
5.7 71
individuals of Brainea insignis and 41 individuals of Spiranthes sinensis were
transplanted to receptor site from 21st to 26th May 2020. Transplantation
Report recording the process of transplantation has been submitted to ET(Wellab),
IEC(Acuity) and the Supervisor (AECOM) for review and record. Post-transplantation
monitoring was conducted once per week in the first three months (June to
August 2020) and once per month during the 12-month establishment period and
the post-establishment period until the end of construction phase of the
Project. The health condition of the transplanted species was monitored by the
Contractor. The Contractor provided maintenance works including watering, use
of mulch and weeding in the first year of establishment to allow health growth
of the transplanted species. Post-transplantation monitoring on transplanted
Brainea insignis and Spiranthes sinensis was conducted on 27th June 2023 during
the reporting month and the post-transplantation monitoring record is shown in Appendix
H. The health condition of the transplanted Brainea insignis affected by
bushfire on 2nd February 2021 was closely monitored and reported in the
post-transplantation monitoring records. The health conditions of the retained
species are generally in fair condition. The Contractor was reminded to closely
monitored the retained species and implemented the protection measures to
protect the retained species.
5.8 During monthly monitoring, no construction
activity and equipment storage was observed within the receptor site. Temporary
protective fence was properly erected and maintained for the transplanted
species.
Table 5.1 Implementation Status of Protection Measures
for Flora Species of Conservation Interest
Recommended Mitigation
Measures |
Implementation Status |
Brainea
insignis |
|
Identification
of Plant Species of Conservation Importance to be Retained / Transplanted |
^ |
To mark trees/plants proposed
to be retained and to be transplanted on the layout plan prior to
commencement of site construction works. |
|
Protection of Plant Species
of Conservation Importance prior to Site Clearance / Transplantation Works |
|
a) No site
clearance shall be started at the locations of flora species of conservation
interest until the transplantation works completed. |
N/A |
b) Set up buffer
zone to enhance the protection of flora species of conservation
importance to be preserved / transplanted including the proposed location for
transplantation when the site clearance works shall commence before the
transplantation works completed. |
N/A |
Temporary
Protective Fence for Flora Species of Conservation Interest / Retained Tree |
|
a) To erect
a temporary protective fence enclosing the flora species of conservation
interest identified under the detailed vegetation survey. |
^ |
b) To set
up a protection zone at least 1m from the plant / retained tree and erect
robust, bright-coloured fencing of 1.5m in height. |
^ |
Maintenance of the Protection
Zone for Flora Species of Conservation Interest / Retained Tree |
|
a)
Monthly monitoring of flora species of conservation interest identified in
the detailed vegetation survey should be conducted. |
^ |
b)
To inspect the temporary protective fence whether it is properly erected and
maintained during construction. |
^ |
Post-transplantation
Monitoring |
|
a)
Weekly post-transplantation monitoring of transplanted species in the first
three months and monthly afterwards. |
^ |
Maintenance of Transplanted
Species |
|
a)
To keep the soil moist by watering the receptor sites properly and
adequately. |
^ |
b)
To apply mulches on the soil surface over the plant root system, if required. |
^ |
c)
To remove unwanted weeds found in receptor sites. |
^ |
Other Protection Measures for
Flora Species of Conservation Interest / Retained Tree / Vegetated Areas |
|
a)
All works should be confined within the site boundary. |
^ |
b)
Access of site staff should be controlled. |
^ |
c)
Care should be taken to prevent trees/plants being damaged by mechanical
equipment or stockpile both during site clearance works and construction
works. |
^ |
d)
No fixings should be driven into trees/plants. |
^ |
e)
No workshop, canteens, or similar should be installed beneath trees/plants,
nor will equipment maintenance etc. be carried out under trees/plants. |
^ |
f)
No excavation, including that for services or changes in ground level will
take place within the spread of the crown of the trees / plants. |
^ |
g)
No soil, debris or construction materials should be deposited around and
against the trunk of a tree/plant as this causes bark damage and compaction
of the soil. |
^ |
h)
No fire should be lit below the branches and no petrol, oil or caustic
substances stored near the trees/plants. |
^ |
i)
No trees/plants should be used for anchoring or winching purposes or for the
display of signs. |
^ |
j)
Any damage or injury to the retained / transplanted plants should be reported
as soon as possible for repair immediately. |
^ |
Spiranthes
sinensis |
|
Identification
of Plant Species of Conservation Importance to be Retained / Transplanted |
|
To mark trees/plants proposed
to be retained and to be transplanted on the layout plan prior to
commencement of site construction works. |
^ |
Protection of Plant Species
of Conservation Importance prior to Site Clearance / Transplantation Works |
|
a) No
site clearance shall be started at the locations of flora species of
conservation interest until the transplantation works completed. |
N/A |
b) Set up
buffer zone to enhance the protection of flora species of conservation
importance to be preserved / transplanted including the proposed location for
transplantation when the site clearance works shall commence before the
transplantation works completed. |
N/A |
Temporary
Protective Fence for Flora Species of Conservation Interest / Retained Tree |
|
a) To erect
a temporary protective fence enclosing the flora species of conservation
interest identified under the detailed vegetation survey. |
^ |
b) To set
up a protection zone at least 1m from the plant / retained tree and erect
robust, bright-coloured fencing of 1.5m in height. |
^ |
Maintenance of the Protection
Zone for Flora Species of Conservation Interest / Retained Tree |
|
a)
Monthly monitoring of flora species of conservation interest identified in
the detailed vegetation survey should be conducted. |
^ |
b)
To inspect the temporary protective fence whether it is properly erected and
maintained during construction. |
^ |
Post-transplantation
Monitoring |
|
a)
Weekly post-transplantation monitoring of transplanted species in the first
three months and monthly afterwards. |
^ |
Maintenance of Transplanted Species |
|
a)
To keep the soil moist by watering the receptor sites properly and
adequately. |
^ |
b)
To apply mulches on the soil surface over the plant root system, if required. |
^ |
c)
To remove unwanted weeds found in receptor sites. |
^ |
Other Protection Measures for
Flora Species of Conservation Interest / Retained Tree / Vegetated Areas |
|
a)
All works should be confined within the site boundary. |
^ |
b)
Access of site staff should be controlled. |
^ |
c)
Care should be taken to prevent trees/plants being damaged by mechanical
equipment or stockpile both during site clearance works and construction
works. |
^ |
d)
No fixings should be driven into trees/plants. |
^ |
e)
No workshop, canteens, or similar should be installed beneath trees/plants,
nor will equipment maintenance etc. be carried out under trees/plants. |
^ |
f)
No excavation, including that for services or changes in ground level will
take place within the spread of the crown of the trees / plants. |
^ |
g)
No soil, debris or construction materials should be deposited around and
against the trunk of a tree/plant as this causes bark damage and compaction
of the soil. |
^ |
h)
No fire should be lit below the branches and no petrol, oil or caustic
substances stored near the trees/plants. |
^ |
i)
No trees/plants should be used for anchoring or winching purposes or for the
display of signs. |
^ |
j)
Any damage or injury to the retained / transplanted plants should be reported
as soon as possible for repair immediately. |
^ |
Implementation status: |
^ |
Mitigation measure was fully
implemented |
* |
Observation/reminder was made
during monitoring but improved/rectified by the contractor |
|
# |
Observation/reminder was made
during monitoring but not yet improved/rectified by the contractor |
|
X |
Non-compliance of mitigation
measure |
|
• |
Non-compliance but rectified
by the contractor |
|
N/A |
Not Applicable at this stage
as no such site activities were conducted in the reporting period |
Precautionary
Measure for Butterfly Species of Conservation Interest
5.9
According
to FEP Condition 2.17, with consideration of minimizing impact on butterfly
species of conservation interest, the re-establishment of the new grassland areas
in the Project site shall be enhanced, through planting of appropriate plant
species which are the larval food plants of butterfly species of conservation
interest such as Small Three-Ring, in order to benefit these species.
5.10
The
re-establishment of grassland areas in the Project shall be implemented before
Commencement of Operation of the Project. Details of the plant species as
larval food plants of butterflies including design and implementation
arrangement will be further submitted under ArchSD’s building works contract.
Precautionary
Measures to Minimize Indirect Disturbance on Ecology
5.11 In
accordance with Section 9.7.3 of EIA Report, mitigation measures for air,
noise, water, waste and landscape aspects could act as precautionary measures
to prevent and minimize any indirect disturbance impact or pollution arisen
from the construction activities on the local ecology and offsite habitats. Site
audits were carried out by ET on weekly basis to monitor the timely
implementation of proper environmental management practices and mitigation
measures on the Project site and the observations are summarised in Section
7.3.
6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL MONITORING
Monitoring
Requirements
6.1 The EIA Report has recommended mitigation
measures for landscape and visual resources to be undertaken during the
construction and operation phases of the Project.
6.2 These measures include the consideration
of a number of development options and the provision of mitigation measures to
directly offset unavoidable impacts. The measures include strategies for
reducing, offsetting and compensating impacts during construction and operation
phases according to Section 10.13 in the EIA Report.
6.3 The implementation and maintenance of
landscape compensatory planting measures is a key aspect of this and shall be
checked to ensure that they are fully realised and that potential conflicts
between the proposed landscape measures and any other Project works and
operational requirements are resolved at the earliest possible date and without
compromise to the intention of the mitigation measures. In addition,
implementation of the mitigation measures recommended by the EIA shall be
monitored throughout the construction phase site audit programme.
6.4 Bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of
landscape and visual mitigation measures was conducted by ET during weekly site
audit. The observation and recommendations made during the audit sessions are
summarised in Table 7.1. The implementation status is given in Appendix K.
7 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INSPECTION
Site Audits
7.1 Site audits were carried out by ET on weekly
basis to monitor the timely implementation of proper environmental management
practices and mitigation measures on the Contract site.
7.2 Site audits were conducted by ET with the
representative of the Engineer’s Representative and the Contractor on 6, 14,
20, 27 June 2023 in the reporting month. Site audits with the representative of
the Contractor and IEC were carried out on 14th June 2023.
7.3 During site inspections in the reporting
month, no non-conformance was identified. The observations and recommendations
made during the audit sessions are summarised in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1 Observations
of Weekly site Inspection and Follow Up Action
Parameters |
Date |
Observations |
Follow Up Action |
Air Quality |
7/6/2023 |
Covering 80% of
stockpiling area by impervious sheets |
Stockpiles removed |
Construction Noise Impact |
-- |
No environmental
deficiency was identified during the reporting month. |
-- |
Water Quality |
20/6/2023 |
Storage of
chemicals should be in accordance with the code of practice on the packaging |
Chemicals removed. |
Waste/ Chemical Management |
-- |
No environmental
deficiency was identified during the reporting month. |
-- |
Landscape and Visual |
-- |
No environmental
deficiency was identified during the reporting month. |
-- |
Ecology |
-- |
No environmental
deficiency was identified during the reporting month. |
-- |
Permit /Licences |
-- |
No environmental
deficiency was identified during the reporting month. |
-- |
Implementation
Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
7.4 According to the EIA Report,
Environmental Permit and the EM&A Manual of the Project, the mitigation
measures detailed in the documents are recommended to be implemented during the
construction phase. An updated summary of the Environmental Mitigation Implementation
Schedule (EMIS) is provided in Appendix K.
Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
7.5 In accordance with the EM&A Manual,
waste management was audited during weekly site audit to determine if wastes
are being managed in accordance with the Waste Management Plan (WMP) prepared
for the Project and the relevant legislative and contractual requirements.
Waste management practice including waste handling, storage, transportation,
and disposal were audited.
7.6 The Contractor has nominated on-site
Environmental Officers to oversee the environmental management, pollution
control measures, good site practices and training of site personnel in waste
management. Proactive measures have been undertaken to make use of construction
and demolition (C&D) materials to minimize the waste generated. On-site
sorting and screening of excavated materials have been carried out to recover
any recyclable portions. Inert C&D materials were used on-site for
backfilling works and hard paving of haul road. In addition, inert C&D
materials generated from excavation works were reused as fill materials in
other local projects. The surplus inert C&D materials were disposed of at
the Government’s public fill reception facilities (PFRFs) for beneficial use by
other projects. In order to monitor the disposal of inert and non-inert C&D
materials and to control fly-tipping, every excavated materials before leaving
the site is weighted by a weight bridge and Trip Ticket System is strictly
followed.
7.7 The Contractors are advised to minimize
the wastes generated through the recycling or reusing. All mitigation measures
stipulated in the EM&A Manual and waste management plans shall be fully
implemented. The status of implementation of waste management and reduction
measures is summarised in Appendix K.
7.8 Waste generated from this Project
includes inert C&D materials and non-inert C&D materials. Non-inert
C&D materials are made up of general refuse and waste that cannot be reused
or recycled and has to be disposed of at the designated landfill sites. The amount
of wastes generated by the construction works of the Project during the
reporting month is shown in Appendix L.
8 ENVIRONMENTAL NON-CONFORMANCE
Summary of
Exceedances
8.1 No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
of air quality was recorded in the reporting month.
8.2 No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
of construction noise was recorded in the reporting month.
8.3 Should the monitoring results of the
environmental monitoring parameters at any designated monitoring stations
indicate that the Action / Limit Levels are exceeded, the actions in accordance
with the Event and Action Plans in Appendix I be carried out. The
summary of exceedance record in reporting month is shown in Appendix J.
Summary of
Environmental Non-Compliance
8.4 No environmental non-compliance was
recorded in the reporting month.
Summary of
Environmental Complaint
8.5 In accordance with the EM&A Manual,
Section 11.3, complaints should be referred to the ET for action. During the
complaint investigation works, the ET and IEC as established according to EP
Condition 2.1 and 2.6 can carry out Ad-hoc site inspections to identify the
source of the complaint, review the effectiveness of the Contractor’s remedial
measures and the updated situation once received the complaint. In addition,
additional monitoring and audit can also be arranged immediately to verify the
situation if necessary. ET and IEC will also oversee the circumstances that
leading to the complaint do not recur. Moreover, ET and IEC can cooperate
efficiently with the Contractor and Supervisor on site for completion of the
investigation.
8.6 There was no environmental complaint
received in the reporting month. The Cumulative Complaint Log since the
commencement of the Project is presented in Appendix M.
Summary of
Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecution
8.7 There was no successful environmental
prosecution or notification of summons received since the Project commencement.
The Cumulative Log for environmental summon and successful prosecution since
the commencement of the Project is presented in Appendix N.
9 FUTURE KEY ISSUES
Key Issues in the Coming Three Months
9.1 The tentative construction programmes for
the Project are provided in Appendix A. The major construction
activities undertaken in the coming three months will include:
- Setting-up of
site office
- Open cut
excavation
- Removal of soil
- Construction of
footings
- Pre-bored
socketed-H Piling
- U.U. Lead in and
Pipe Duct Connection
9.2 With reference to the site layout plan
including the indication of coming three months construction site activities in
Appendix A, potential environmental impacts arising from the above
construction activities are mainly associated with construction dust, noise,
water quality, waste management, landscape and visual and ecology. The
foreseeable environmental impacts were taken into consideration of the planned
mitigation measures in the coming months.
9.3 The mitigation measures to be implemented
for the coming three months were proposed by the Contractor and reviewed by ET,
IEC and the Engineers through Email, during site audit and SSEMC meeting. The
Proactive Environmental Protection Proforma summarizing the major site
activities, potential environmental impacts and recommended mitigation measures
was reviewed and endorsed by the Engineers, ET and IEC and was shown in Appendix
A.
9.4 Dust can be generated during construction
works and exposed site area during dry weather. To prevent high dust
concentrations during the dry weather, the Contractor should pay attention on
the air quality mitigation measures as far as practicable to minimise the dust
impact to the villages which are located adjacent to the Project works (refer
to the layout plan in Appendix A). The Contractor was also reminded to
follow the Project Implementation Schedule in approved EIA report / EM&A
Manual to implement appropriate dust control measure including “Use of regular
water spraying (once every 1.25 hours or 8 times per day) to reduce dust
emissions from heavy construction activities (including ground excavation,
earth moving, etc.) at all active works area exposed site surfaces and unpaved
roads, particularly during dry weather and covering 80% of stockpiling area by
impervious sheets and spraying all dusty material with water immediately prior
to any loading transfer operations to keep the dusty materials wet during
material handling at the stockpile areas” as well as the relevant dust control
practices as stipulated in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation so that no adverse dust impact arising from the Project works site.
9.5 In addition, construction noise is also
one of the key environmental issues during construction of the Project. Noise
mitigation measures such as using quiet plants and noise barriers should be in
place, where applicable. In addition, the Contractor was reminded to frequently
check and maintain the acoustic materials wrapped on noisy part of PME and
ensure no gaps between noise barriers; proactively identify any potential
construction noise impact to NSRs and provide sufficient mitigation measures if
necessary; and provide notification to nearby villagers in Kong Nga Po for
potential noisy works at works area.
9.6 The Contractor is also recommended to
maintain water quality mitigation measures during construction works. The dikes or embankments for flood protection
should be implemented around the boundaries of earthwork areas. Temporary
ditches should be provided to facilitate the runoff discharge into an
appropriate watercourse, through a site/sediment trap. The sediment/silt traps
should be incorporated in the permanent drainage channels to enhance deposition
rates. Efficient silt removal facilities shall be deployed to ensure all
treated effluent from wastewater treatment plant shall meet the requirements as
stated in WPCO licences. The site drainage plan shall also be updated based on
the site condition and construction programme.
Monitoring Schedule for the Next Month
9.7 The tentative environmental monitoring
schedule for the next month is shown in Appendix D.
10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions
10.1 This Monthly EM&A Report presents the
EM&A work undertaken in June 2023 in accordance with EM&A Manual.
10.2 No Action/Limit Level exceedance was
recorded for air quality monitoring in the reporting month.
10.3 No Action/Limit Level exceedance was recorded
for construction noise monitoring in the reporting month.
10.4 Environmental
site inspections were conducted on 6,
14, 20, 27 June 2023 and landscape
and visual monitoring was carried out on 6, 13 June whereas ecological
monitoring was carried out on 27 June by ETL in the reporting month. No
environmental non-compliance was recorded in the reporting month.
10.5 No environmental complaint, notification of
summons or successful prosecutions was received in the reporting month.
10.6 The ET would keep track on the EM&A
programme to ensure compliance of environmental requirements and the proper
implementation of all necessary mitigation measures.
Recommendations
10.7 According to the environmental audits
performed in the reporting month, the following recommendations were made:
Air Quality Impact
l
To
maintain the cover for stockpile of dusty materials and exposed slope for dust
suppression;
l
To
enhance the dust suppression measures including watering for the dust
generation works, exposed site area and haul road;
l
To
regular check the valid NRMM labels are properly displayed on the regulated
machines and non-road vehicles; and
l
To
maintain the wheel washing facilities provided at every construction site exit
where practicable are functioning properly.
Construction Noise
l
To
keep inspect the noise sources inside the site;
l
To
keep space out noisy equipment and position the equipment as far away as
possible from sensitive receivers; and
l
To
maintain temporary noise barriers for operations of noisy equipment near the
noise sensitive receivers, if necessary.
Water Impact
l
To
maintain the cover for open stockpile of and exposed slope;
l
To
keep reviewing and updating temporary drainage system;
l
To
maintain the earth bunds or sand bag barriers on site to direct stormwater to
silt removal facilities;
l
To
maintain and ensure the silt removal facilities are functioning properly;
l
To
maintain the wheel washing facilities provided at every construction site exit
where practicable are functioning properly; and
l
To
divert the muddy water at the retention pond to the wetsep for treatment before
discharging out.
Waste/Chemical Management
l
To
check for any accumulation of waste materials or rubbish on site;
l
To
avoid any discharge or accidental spillage of chemical waste or oil directly
from the site;
l
To
maintain the drip tray well to prevent oil and chemical leakage; and
l
To
avoid improper handling, storage and dispose of oil drums or chemical
containers on site.
Ecology
l
To
erect and maintain the protection fence around the retained trees /
conservation species;
l
To
keep the tree protection zone large enough to protect the tress; and
l
To
remove the construction materials within the tree protection zone.
Landscape and Visual
l
To
erect and maintain the protection fencing and tree protection zone around the
preserved trees;
l
To
remove the construction materials within the tree protection zone; and
l
To
keep the tree protection zone large enough to protect the tress.